Remove Resuscitation Remove Sepsis Remove Stroke
article thumbnail

Sniffing out Sepsis - Vibes vs Scoring Systems?

Taming the SRU

Early Physician Gestalt Versus Usual Screening Tools for the Prediction of Sepsis in Critically Ill Emergency Patients. Ann Emerg Med 2024 Background Sepsis remains an increasingly common emergency department condition that is tied to higher morbidity and mortality across the United States as well as the rest of the world.

Sepsis 88
article thumbnail

REBEL Cast Ep116: The CLOVERS Trial – Restrictive vs Liberal Fluids in Sepsis-Induced Hypotension

RebelEM

Background: IV fluids are part of the standard resuscitation bundle in septic shock, however it is unclear if they provide a significant benefit. Early Restrictive or Liberal Fluid Management for Sepsis-Induced Hypotension. Liberal: 14.9% Estimated Difference: -0.9%; 95% CI 04.4 Liberal: 14.9% Estimated Difference: -0.9%; 95% CI 04.4

Sepsis 105
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

A Beginner’s Guide to Vasoactive Drug use in Children with Septic Shock

Don't Forget the Bubbles

Four-year-old Ed is being resuscitated for presumed Invasive Group A Streptococcal Sepsis from tonsilitis. Obviously, one also needs to address the cause of the shock, or any efforts in resuscitation will only bring a temporary improvement. The next element of stroke volume is the emptying. After 40ml/kg of IV 0.9%

Shock 143
article thumbnail

2023 Critical Care Year in Review (Part 1)

PulmCCM

Sepsis, infectious disease Managing septic shock with a restrictive-fluids approach (preferentially using vasopressors after a single liter crystalloid bolus) led to similar outcomes as the usual practice of bolusing large volumes of fluids first. Either approach in severe sepsis with shock seems reasonable.

Sepsis 94
article thumbnail

Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring in Critically Ill Adults?

RebelEM

were they in the resuscitative phase? were they in the resuscitative phase? This study does not address the utility of arterial lines vs NIBP in the acute resuscitative phase Author Conclusion: “There was broad agreement between IABP and NIBP in critically ill patients over a range of BPs and severity of illness. to 2.47; p – 0.04

article thumbnail

emDOCs Podcast – Episode 85: Tricky Cases Part 1

EMDocs

Learning points: Consider differential – sepsis, thyroid storm, thalamic stroke, exertional and classic heat stroke, serotonin syndrome, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, sympathomimetic toxicity, and anticholinergics. Resuscitate and administer antibiotics. Start resuscitation early with vasopressors, antibiotics.

article thumbnail

Issue #2: The Latest in Critical Care, 5/22/23

PulmCCM

More patients (9% vs 4%) had adverse events in the early mobilization group, including 7 serious events in the early-mobilization group (mostly arrhythmias and one stroke) vs 1 in the usual care group. centers, patients with sepsis and systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg all received at least 1000 mL of crystalloid.