Remove Outcomes Remove Resuscitation Remove Sepsis
article thumbnail

Congestive Heart Failure and Sepsis: A Closer Look at Fluid Management

RebelEM

For those with sepsis, the administration of intravenous fluids (IVF) at the volumes recommended in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) requires careful consideration of an individual’s chronic medical conditions and subsequent sensitivity to IVF. Outcomes: Primary Outcome: In-hospital mortality. Am J Emerg Med.

Sepsis 122
article thumbnail

REBEL Cast Ep116: The CLOVERS Trial – Restrictive vs Liberal Fluids in Sepsis-Induced Hypotension

RebelEM

Background: IV fluids are part of the standard resuscitation bundle in septic shock, however it is unclear if they provide a significant benefit. The secondary outcome of mortality was not statistically different however numerically favored the early use of norepinephrine. This resulted in better shock control by 6hrs (76.1%

Sepsis 105
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Diastolic Shock Index: A clinically relevant predictor of poor outcome in septic shock?

Taming the SRU

Diastolic shock index and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock. Background Early recognition and resuscitation of patients in septic shock are critical skills for an emergency medicine physician. the diastolic shock index) could provide providers a tool to quickly identify patients that are at risk for unfavorable outcomes.

Shock 52
article thumbnail

Adjunctive Methylene Blue in Septic Shock?

RebelEM

Background: Sepsis can induce numerous physiologic derangements. Judicious fluid resuscitation is indicated in patients with signs of hypo perfusion but is often inadequate necessitating the administration of vasoactive medications. septic shock). NaCl over 6hrs once daily x3 doses Placebo: 500mL of 0.9% 95% CI 15.4 95% CI 15.4

Shock 145
article thumbnail

2023 Critical Care Year in Review (Part 1)

PulmCCM

Sepsis, infectious disease Managing septic shock with a restrictive-fluids approach (preferentially using vasopressors after a single liter crystalloid bolus) led to similar outcomes as the usual practice of bolusing large volumes of fluids first. Either approach in severe sepsis with shock seems reasonable.

Sepsis 94
article thumbnail

52 in 52 – #41: The CENSER Trial

EMDocs

mL/kg/hr for 2 consecutive hours OR Decrease in serum lactate by more than 10% from initial level Primary outcome – Early norepinephrine group vs. the control group demonstrated higher rates of shock control at 6 hours: 76.1% vs 48.4% (OR 3.4, vs 48.4% (OR 3.4, vs 48.4% (OR 3.4, vs 48.4% (OR 3.4, vs 48.4% (OR 3.4, vs 48.4% (OR 3.4,

Sepsis 66
article thumbnail

Ep 122 Sepsis and Septic Shock – What Matters from EM Cases Course

Emergency Medicine Cases

Sara Gray, intensivist and emergency physician, co-author of The CAEP Sepsis Guidelines, answers questions such as: How does one best recognize occult septic shock? How does SIRS, qSOFA and NEWS compare in predicting poor outcomes in septic patients? Which fluid and how much fluid is best for resuscitation of the septic shock patients?

Sepsis 40