Remove Documentation/Coding Remove EKG/ECG Remove Outcomes
article thumbnail

ECG Blog #366 — Diltiazem didn't work.

Ken Grauer, MD

The ECG and long lead II rhythm strip in Figure-1 — was obtained from a COVID positive patient with persistent tachycardia not responding to Diltiazem. Figure-1: The initial ECG — obtained from a patient with persistent tachycardia. ( To improve visualization — I've digitized the original ECG using PMcardio ).

EKG/ECG 195
article thumbnail

Chest pain and computer ‘normal’ ECG. Wait for troponin? And what is the reference standard for ECG diagnosis? Cardiologist or outcome?

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

Written by Jesse McLaren A 50 year old presented to triage with one hour of chest pain, and the following ECG labeled normal by the computer (GE Marquette SL) algorithm. see reference below) Whats the gold standard for ECG interpretation: is it cardiologist interpretation? What do you think? The latest is Langlois-Carbonneau et al.

EKG/ECG 89
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

A Comprehensive Guide to Surgical Clerking

Mind The Bleep

Unless you’re documenting something hilarious, please keep it brief and to the point. History of Presenting Complaint In this section use SOCRATES to document the pain. Drugs/Allergies When documenting drugs – try to get the dose and frequency (this can be found on Summary Care Records from the GP if you have access).

article thumbnail

Chest pain with serial ECGs – can you guess the sequence?

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

Below are serial ECGs focusing on the inferior leads and aVL. First, what’s the interpretation of each ECG on its own? #1 2 Normal ECG #3. 2 Normal ECG #3. But 90 minutes later troponin returned at 70ng/L (normal <26 in males and <16 in females), and a repeat ECG was done (ECG#2) for recurring chest pain.

EKG/ECG 112
article thumbnail

Four patients with chest pain and ‘normal’ ECG: can you trust the computer interpretation?

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

All initial ECGs were labeled ‘normal’ or ‘otherwise normal’ by the computer interpretation, and below are the ECGs with the final cardiology interpretation. 1-3] But these studies were very short duration and used cardiology interpretation of ECGs or emergent angiography rather than patient outcomes.

EKG/ECG 119
article thumbnail

Three patients with chest pain and “normal” ECGs: which had OMI? Which were normal? And how did the Queen of Hearts perform?

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

Written by Jesse McLaren Three patients presented with acute chest pain and ECGs that were labeled by the computer as completely normal, and which was confirmed by the final cardiology interpretation (which is blinded to patient outcome) also as completely normal. It is well known that NOMI usually has a normal ECG or nonspecific ECG.

EKG/ECG 119
article thumbnail

The Expert Witness re-visits a chest pain Malpractice case using the Queen of Hearts

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

Don't miss his analysis and assessment of the Queen of Hearts AI OMI ECG bot -- that assessment is at the very bottom of the post. Her first set of vitals were documented: BP 116/57 Pulse 94bpm Respiratory rate 24/min O2 sat 90% on room air Temp 97F She had been cleaning a Jeep in the sun, and was sunburned. But which artery?

EKG/ECG 92