Remove Administration Remove Outcomes Remove Resuscitation
article thumbnail

Intraosseous vs intravenous access: which is better during resuscitation?

PulmCCM

For out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in particular, intravenous access can be difficult to establish, delaying the administration of epinephrine and other drugs and possibly worsening outcomes. Are intraosseous devices superior to peripheral IVs for vascular access during resuscitation attempts? Read more

article thumbnail

EM@3AM: Murine Typhus

EMDocs

The disease is generally mild, but in untreated cases, it can lead to more severe outcomes, especially in patients with underlying conditions such as glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Even though the disease often resolves spontaneously, prompt antibiotic therapy is essential for optimal outcomes. pregnant patients).

EMS 105
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Neurogenic Shock in Children

Pediatric EM Morsels

Crystalloid may help, but neurogenic shock may not respond to fluid administration. While we may allow permissive hypotension in damage control resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock, in neurogenic shock you should maintain an age-appropriate blood pressure. Alpha 1 agonists are necessary to maintain appropriate blood pressure.

Shock 304
article thumbnail

Cardiac arrest and IO

Emergency Medicine Education

I personally believe that having a secure line, whether a peripheral IV or central line, is essential for resuscitating a patient. A recent article in NEJM highlighted that the drug administration route—IV versus IO—matters in terms of successful resuscitation, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and favorable neurological outcomes.

article thumbnail

Don’t Forget About the IO in the Critically Ill Patient

RebelEM

Critically ill patients requiring resuscitation often present with many challenges including the ability to secure safe, sterile, fast, and reliable intravenous (IV) access. This can often lead to significant delays in proper resuscitation. Studies reviewed landmark-based CVC compared to IO; using IJ, subclavian, and femoral CVC sites.

article thumbnail

EM@3AM: Stercoral Colitis

EMDocs

If sepsis or septic shock is present, aggressive fluid resuscitation and empiric antibiotics covering intra-abdominal flora should be administered. Therefore, administration of IV morphine (A) would not be recommended. Stercoral Colitis in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Review of Presentation, Management, and Outcomes.

EMS 97
article thumbnail

Less is More. Again: Speed of IV Fluid Administration in Pancreatitis (WATERFALL Trial)

RebelEM

There are also potential harms to large volume fluid resuscitation including progression of pancreatitis and fluid overload with or without respiratory failure. Though the initial recommendation for aggressive fluid resuscitation was not based on substantial evidence, clinicians have been slow to pivot away from this approach.