2019 Fluid Resuscitation Outcomes 
Sensible Medicine
MARCH 14, 2025
The only problem was that the patient population would change over the course of the study – the unscreened population was studied mostly in 2019 and early 2020 while the screened population was mostly late 2020 early 2021. Outcomes and patients The primary outcome was 90-day in-hospital mortality. Now to the journal.
EMDocs
DECEMBER 6, 2024
7 Workup other than serum iron concentration at 4 hours after ingestion not shown to accurately predict clinical outcomes or severity of toxicity. Aggressive fluid resuscitation as patients may be severely hypovolemic from GI symptoms. McGraw Hill; 2019. 1 Management: Supportive care first and foremost. 2 L/hr in adults.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
RebelEM
NOVEMBER 30, 2023
This systematic review and meta-analysis attempts to elucidate whether a more conservative fluid resuscitation approach is warranted in volume sensitive sepsis patients, such as those with congestive heart failure (CHF). Outcomes: Primary Outcome: In-hospital mortality. Am J Emerg Med. 2023;73:34-39. 2.89, p = 0.01.
RebelEM
MAY 25, 2023
vs 3U) but no difference in mortality (Study not powered for this outcome) Clinical Take Home Point: The use of vasopressors is controversial and requires a nuanced approach SUMMARY OF MINIMIZING IATROGENIC INJURY RESTORE PERFUSION VOLUME REPLACEMENT Blood Products >>> Crystalloids Holcomb JB et al. NEJM 1994. [2] NEJM 1994. [2]
Mind The Bleep
OCTOBER 29, 2024
Establish IV access and begin fluid resuscitation with 250ml boluses of 0.9% This includes adequate pain control, fluid resuscitation, and stabilization of any systemic complications. Proper stabilization and detailed communication with the burns centre are essential for optimal patient outcomes. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
RebelEM
OCTOBER 2, 2023
Background: DKA is traditionally treated with fluid resuscitation, electrolyte replacement, and intravenous infusions of insulin. No statistical differences in safety between groups Operational Impact Median ED LOS (PRIMARY OUTCOME): SQuID: 8.9hrs (6.5 tests/hr (0.8 Traditional: 1.0 tests/hr (0.8 Pre-Intervention: 1.0
Dr. Smith's ECG Blog
AUGUST 2, 2024
the investigators reviewed outcomes in 118 patients presenting with NSTEMI. Yet recognition of acute RV MI is extremely important clinically — because emergency treatment will often require different priorities (ie, avoidance of nitroglycerine; fluid resuscitation for hypotension ). 118.007305) from Heitner et al. ,
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
94 
Let's personalize your content